The Definition Of Utilitarianism - Free Essay Example

John Stuart Mill was a famous philosopher and historian. The utilitarianism was originally writing by Jeremy Bentham and later redeveloped by John Stuart Mill. The definition of Utilitarianism is an ethical theory according to which the rightness and wrongness of acts depends entirely on facts about the maximization of overall well-being. Which also it is a commonly that on the associated with the phrase of the the greatest good for the greatest number and it is also that requires the people to act in every way that will result in the greatest of possible in the amount of the well-being. Consequence principle is the way to view the rightness and wrongness of acts depends entirely on facts about the consequences of acts. Which means that no acts are the right in and of itself and no acts are wrong in and of itself. The Mill Utilitarianism in the 1861, was to cover the explanation of utilitarian moral theory. In way to respond the criticism of the doctrine, he was not only argued in the favor of the basic principle of the Jeremy Bentham but, he was also offered an important improvement to the structure, meaning, and the application. In the John Mill based on his utilitarian, principle was one of the decisions that we make. So, he was saying that the decision should always be benefit in the most people as much as possible no matter what the consequences might be. He was assumed that the outset of everyone would agree in the consequences of the human actions that contribute an important on their moral value. Even that he is fully accepted Benthams devotion on the greatest happiness principle as the basic of the statement to the utilitarian value. As he said, actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure (Utilitarianism 2). After more than 2000 years, people still have been attempting to determine in the basis of the morality, but still people have not come any closer to the consensus. So, Mill acknowledges in the science, it is a common to have disagreement about such based or the foundations. In fact, the difference of the quality of a pleasure to be the considered as well as the difference in the quantity. So, Mill started argues that the difference of the quality is to be the measured in preferences rather than quality. As he statements, Of two pleasures, if there be one to which all or almost all who have experience of both give a decided preference, irrespective of any feeling of moral obligation to prefer it, that is the more desirable pleasure. Mill was recognizing the between in the higher and lower of the pleasures in order to respond the philosophy. However, the difference between the quality and quantity is not something new. Which Mill state himself that utilitarian writers in general have placed the superiority of mental over bodily pleasures which it seems like he rejects to the measure of the pleasure in any kind of numbers scale.